皇家华人

Many political leaders around the world have reached for the imagery of conflict to describe the coronavirus pandemic. In France, President Emmanuel Macron said his nation was at war with an invisible enemy. Over in the US, President Donald Trump positively revels in the idea of being a 鈥渨artime president鈥�. In the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has spoken of the virus as an 鈥渆nemy鈥� and even said that 鈥渨e must act like any wartime government鈥� to protect the economy.

But in Germany this kind of language is not circulating. The virus is not an 鈥渆nemy鈥�, and the process of containing it is not a war. Perhaps there鈥檚 a tendency among German politicians to avoid war metaphors for historical reasons. There may be a feeling that it does not go down well nationally and internationally if German political leaders speak about war, even metaphorically.

This is particularly the case because the far-right AfD party has been trying to expand the limits of what is acceptable in Germany. One of its leaders recently lamented Germany鈥檚 loss of territory after the second world war 鈥� a position that has been condemned by many, including the Central Council of Jews in Germany.

So German chancellor Angela Merkel does not use war imagery when talking about the coronavirus. In fact, she hardly uses any metaphors at all. Her first major public interaction during the crisis was a televised address on March 18. Merkel鈥檚 words to describe the crisis were simple and straightforward. She spoke of 鈥渢his situation鈥�, 鈥渁 historical task鈥�, and a 鈥済reat challenge鈥� ahead.

When Merkel alluded to the past, it was to express a desire not to return to it. She referred to her own history growing up in the GDR when emphasising that the decision to curtail democratic freedoms had not been taken lightly.

In a speech to the German parliament on April 23, Merkel again used few metaphors. She called the current situation a 鈥渞eal test鈥�, 鈥渟erious times鈥�, a 鈥渄ramatic crisis鈥�, a 鈥済igantic challenge鈥�. The only figurative expressions she used were 鈥渢hin ice鈥� and 鈥渓ong-distance run鈥�. These metaphors evoke challenge, but not combat.

It鈥檚 true that drastic words and passionate statements were never Merkel鈥檚 style, but other German politicians have taken a similar approach. Among the 16 regional leaders, two have been especially prominent in the debate about the coronavirus: Bavarian leader Markus S枚der and Armin Laschet, of North Rhine-Westphalia.

Like the chancellor, S枚der mostly uses straightforward vocabulary to describe the virus: it鈥檚 鈥渁n exponential development鈥�, a 鈥渃risis鈥�, and a 鈥渢ask鈥�.

Laschet, too, has been been vocal in the debates about the coronavirus, possibly because he aspires to be Merkel鈥檚 successor as chancellor and may therefore feel the need to make his mark. He used rather more dramatic language but still stops short of going to war. He speaks of an 鈥渁dversary鈥� (but not an 鈥渆nemy鈥�) and has warned that people have to make sacrifices. By the end of April, he also had gone back to more neutral expressions: the 鈥渟ituation鈥�, the 鈥渆vent鈥�.

While speeches by German politicians have mostly been easy to follow and unambiguous, there has been some confusion, too. Different states across the country鈥檚 federal structure decided on different rules at the beginning of the lockdown. For example, when Lower Saxony closed DIY stores in March, there was an exodus of people to neighbouring states where they were still open, causing Lower Saxony to backtrack.

Low death rate

Overall it looks like Germany has done comparatively well so far. The German government imposed containment measures on March 17, at a fairly early stage in the pandemic. At the time of writing, there were 179,000 cases and 8,300 deaths in Germany, which is far fewer than in many other European countries.

The response from the German public has been mostly positive. Approval ratings for Merkel and her party, the centre-right CDU, went up in recent weeks.

However, a small but vocal minority of protesters has been demanding an end to the measures. Paradoxically, they are gaining traction at the moment, now that the lockdown has been relaxed, and although the measures in Germany were fairly mild compared to Spain, Italy, or France.

The protesters are a rather strange alliance 鈥� some are worried about their democratic rights or about the economy, but others are members of the extreme right, conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers, and anti-Semites. The financial crisis of 2008 had in all probability contributed to the rise of the AfD. Now, with another massive economic slump on the horizon, the threat of right-wing extremism is likely to increase.

This article was originally published in on 22 May.

Image:

Image by听听蹿谤辞尘听听

Links

• UCL School of European Languages, Culture and Society (SELCS)
• UCL Faculty of Arts & Humanities